Business & Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mahon, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Business & Society, Vol. 36, No. 1, 5-31 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/000765039703600102

The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate

Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research

Jennifer J. Griffin

John F. Mahon

Boston University

This article extends earlier research concerning the relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance, with particular emphasis on methodological inconsistencies. Research in this area is extended in three critical areas. First, it focuses on a particular industry, the chemical industry. Second, it uses multiple sources of data-two that are perceptual based (KLD Index and Fortune reputation survey), and two that are performance based (TRI database and corporate philanthropy) in order to triangulate toward assessing corporate social performance. Third, it uses the five most commonly applied accounting measures in the corporate social performance and corporate financial performance (CSP/CFP) literature to assess corporate financial performance. The results indicate that the a priori use of measures may actually predetermine the CSP/CFP relationship outcome. Surprisingly, Fortune and KLD indices very closely track one another, whereas TRI and corporate philanthropy differentiate between high and low social performers and do not correlate to the firm's financial performance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
J. D. Harris
Financial Misrepresentation: Antecedents and Performance Effects
Business Society, September 1, 2008; 47(3): 390 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
C.-A. Tetrault Sirsly and K. Lamertz
When Does a Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Provide a First-Mover Advantage?
Business Society, September 1, 2008; 47(3): 343 - 369.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
P. Cox, S. Brammer, and A. Millington
Pension Funds and Corporate Social Performance: An Empirical Analysis
Business Society, June 1, 2008; 47(2): 213 - 241.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
C. Shropshire and A. J. Hillman
A Longitudinal Study of Significant Change in Stakeholder Management
Business Society, March 1, 2007; 46(1): 63 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
J. J. Griffin and J. Weber
Industry Social Analysis: Examining the Beer Industry
Business Society, December 1, 2006; 45(4): 413 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
R. A. Bernardi, S. M. Bosco, and K. M. Vassill
Does Female Representation on Boards of Directors Associate With Fortune's "100 Best Companies to Work For" List?
Business Society, June 1, 2006; 45(2): 235 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
J. E. Mattingly and S. L. Berman
Measurement of Corporate Social Action: Discovering Taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini Ratings Data
Business Society, March 1, 2006; 45(1): 20 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
B. B. Longest Jr
The community development potential of large health services organizations
Community Dev. J., January 1, 2006; 41(1): 89 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
M.-M. Meijer and T. Schuyt
Corporate Social Performance as a Bottom Line for Consumers
Business Society, December 1, 2005; 44(4): 442 - 461.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
F. G. A. De Bakker, P. Groenewegen, and F. Den Hond
A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance
Business Society, September 1, 2005; 44(3): 283 - 317.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
T. L. Besser and N. J. Miller
The Risks of Enlightened Self-Interest: Small Businesses and Support for Community
Business Society, December 1, 2004; 43(4): 398 - 425.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
S. Brammer and A. Millington
Stakeholder Pressure, Organizational Size, and the Allocation of Departmental Responsibility for the Management of Corporate Charitable Giving
Business Society, September 1, 2004; 43(3): 268 - 295.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
D. K. Peterson
The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organizational Commitment
Business Society, September 1, 2004; 43(3): 296 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
B. Seifert, S. A. Morris, and B. R. Bartkus
Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance
Business Society, June 1, 2004; 43(2): 135 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Marketing TheoryHome page
M. J. Polonsky, L. Carlson, and M.-L. Fry
The Harm Chain: A Public Policy Development and Stakeholder Perspective
Marketing Theory, September 1, 2003; 3(3): 345 - 364.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization EnvironmentHome page
J. Entine
The Myth of Social Investing: A Critique of its Practice and Consequences for Corporate Social Performance Research
Organization Environment, September 1, 2003; 16(3): 352 - 368.
[PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
D. H. Saiia, A. B. Carroll, and A. K. Buchholtz
Philanthropy as Strategy: When Corporate Charity "Begins at Home"
Business Society, June 1, 2003; 42(2): 169 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
S. A. Welcomer, P. L. Cochran, G. Rands, and M. Haggerty
Constructing a Web: Effects of Power and Social Responsiveness on Firm-Stakeholder Relationships
Business Society, March 1, 2003; 42(1): 43 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
M. Orlitzky, F. L. Schmidt, and S. L. Rynes
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Organization Studies, March 1, 2003; 24(3): 403 - 441.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
C. E. Dawkins
Corporate Welfare, Corporate Citizenship, and the Question of Accountability
Business Society, September 1, 2002; 41(3): 269 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
B. R. Bartkus, S. A. Morris, and B. Seifert
Governance and Corporate Philanthropy: Restraining Robin Hood?
Business Society, September 1, 2002; 41(3): 319 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
R. Kumar, W. B. Lamb, and R. E. Wokutch
The End of South African Sanctions, Institutional Ownership, and the Stock Price Performance of Boycotted Firms: Evidence on the Impact of Social/Ethical Investing
Business Society, June 1, 2002; 41(2): 133 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
M. Orlitzky and J. D. Benjamin
Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review
Business Society, December 1, 2001; 40(4): 369 - 396.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
B. M. Mitnick
Commitment, Revelation, and the Testaments of Belief: The Metrics of Measurement of Corporate Social Performance
Business Society, December 1, 2000; 39(4): 419 - 465.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
A. B. Carroll
A Commentary and an Overview of Key Questions on Corporate Social Performance Measurement
Business Society, December 1, 2000; 39(4): 466 - 478.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
J. J. Griffin
Corporate Social Performance: Research Directions for the 21st Century
Business Society, December 1, 2000; 39(4): 479 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
D. W. Greening and D. B. Turban
Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce
Business Society, September 1, 2000; 39(3): 254 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
B. Shaffer, T. J. Quasney, and C. M. Grimm
Firm Level Performance Implications of Nonmarket Actions
Business Society, June 1, 2000; 39(2): 126 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
A. Prakash
Responsible Care: An Assessment
Business Society, June 1, 2000; 39(2): 183 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
B. W. Husted
A Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance
Business Society, March 1, 2000; 39(1): 24 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
R. M. Roman, S. Hayibor, and B. R. Agle
The Relationship between Social and Financial Performance: Repainting a Portrait
Business Society, March 1, 1999; 38(1): 109 - 125.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
J. F. Mahon and J. J. Griffin
Painting a Portrait: A Reply
Business Society, March 1, 1999; 38(1): 126 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Business SocietyHome page
R. B. Hutton, L. D'Antonio, and T. Johnsen
Socially Responsible Investing: Growing Issues and New Opportunities
Business Society, September 1, 1998; 37(3): 281 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]