This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carroll, A. B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Corporate Social Responsibility

Evolution of a Definitional Construct

University of Georgia

There is an impressive history associated with the evolution of the concept and definition of corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this article, the author traces the evolution of the CSR construct beginning in the 1950s, which marks the modern era of CSR. Definitions expanded during the 1960s and proliferated during the 1970s. In the 1980s, there were fewer new definitions, more empirical research, and alternative themes began to mature. These alternative themes included corporate social performance (CSP), stakeholder theory, and business ethics theory. In the 1990s, CSR continues to serve as a core construct but yields to or is transformed into alternative thematic frameworks.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. O. Laplume, K. Sonpar, and R. A. Litz Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us Journal of Management, December 1, 2008; 34(6): 1152 - 1189. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Montiel Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability: Separate Pasts, Common Futures Organization Environment, September 1, 2008; 21(3): 245 - 269. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Schwartz and A. B. Carroll Integrating and Unifying Competing and Complementary Frameworks: The Search for a Common Core in the Business and Society Field Business Society, June 1, 2008; 47(2): 148 - 186. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. B. Antal and A. Sobczak Corporate Social Responsibility in France: A Mix of National Traditions and International Influences Business Society, March 1, 2007; 46(1): 9 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Dickson and M. Eckman Social Responsibility: The Concept As Defined by Apparel and Textile Scholars Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, July 1, 2006; 24(3): 178 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Park and S. J. Lennon The Organizational Factors Influencing Socially Responsible Apparel Buying/Sourcing Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, July 1, 2006; 24(3): 229 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. A. Ramus and I. Montiel When Are Corporate Environmental Policies a Form of Greenwashing? Business Society, December 1, 2005; 44(4): 377 - 414. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M.-M. Meijer and T. Schuyt Corporate Social Performance as a Bottom Line for Consumers Business Society, December 1, 2005; 44(4): 442 - 461. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. G. A. De Bakker, P. Groenewegen, and F. Den Hond A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance Business Society, September 1, 2005; 44(3): 283 - 317. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Boehm The Participation of Businesses in Community Decision Making Business Society, June 1, 2005; 44(2): 144 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M.-E. Boyle Walking Our Talk: Business Schools, Legitimacy, and Citizenship Business Society, March 1, 2004; 43(1): 37 - 68. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. M. Mitnick Commitment, Revelation, and the Testaments of Belief: The Metrics of Measurement of Corporate Social Performance Business Society, December 1, 2000; 39(4): 419 - 465. [Abstract] [PDF]